On December 23

Aim at gold saint the hero withdraw a confession and the witness turns over the circumstance of certificate, three county check Chas the public prosecution person of the hospital broadcasts to check a Cha organization to synchronously record image when the Xun asks the gold saint the hero by law and prove to check a Cha organization the none illegally obtains evidence and uses defense that the fact refuted sharply a gold saint hero.
November 28 starts and appears to take bribe the invitation card of case concerning the gold saint hero on the net, 10 witnesses withdraw a confession to become an artificial hair gold saint hero to shout Yuan together of a main basis.
On December 23, three county courts again hold court to take up gold saint the hero take bribe a case, 10 witnesses continue to turn over a certificate.On January 18 this year, it is already a gold saint hero to take bribe a for the third time being in court session of the case.Law court investigated to check a Cha organization the Xun ask the gold saint the whole distanceses of the hero and inquiry witness to synchronously record image and have never discovered to check a Cha organization to against a method to obtain evidence phenomenon, on these grounds judge gold saint the hero and witness take this as reason to withdraw a confession, turn over a certificate after the indictment and have no reasonable explanation and related evidence to corroborate, can not establish;The gold saint hero is investigating a stage to make a deposition to accept bribe, can corroborate each other with other evidence of this case, while he reviews in the court in overthrow to originally make a deposition of reason insufficiency, also have no other evidence to corroborate, not to adopt;Think the hero of gold saint makes use of job convenience and seeks a benefits for others and illegally receives others wealth and properties, should affirm in order to take bribe a crime, all adopted the public prosecution opinion of the organization of check Cha, make by law an above-mentioned verdict.(Reporter, Qiu Li Hua, )